Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,616,636 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $57,384, a difference of 39.3%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $127,430, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $68,716, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $55,913, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $46,902, a difference of 21.4%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 50.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 53.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 10.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 116.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 106.4%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%).