Pima vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,623,207 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $57,384, a difference of 87.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $122,893, a difference of 67.5%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $127,430, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,913, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,902, a difference of 32.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 123.4%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 112.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 110.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 45.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 122.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 132.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 104.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.22, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 64.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 144.8%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 131.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 93.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 87.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 10.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%).