Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,632,077 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 170.6 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $57,384, a difference of 37.1%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $127,430, a difference of 33.2%), and median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $68,716, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $55,913, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $46,902, a difference of 20.1%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.4%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 91.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 91.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%).