Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,921,584 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($116,460 compared to $104,090, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $69,857, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $122,893, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($57,742 compared to $57,384, a difference of 0.62%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $46,902, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (23.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.5%), single female poverty (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.48%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple households (52.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.75%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (50.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 101.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 57.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 8th grade (95.9% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%).