Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,884,975 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 10.2 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $57,384, a difference of 51.6%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $68,716, a difference of 39.7%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $127,430, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,913, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $69,857, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 33.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.3%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 52.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 90.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 142.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 121.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%).