Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,653,931 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,910 compared to $57,384, a difference of 64.4%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $127,430, a difference of 62.8%), and median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $68,716, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $55,913, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $46,902, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 108.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 59.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 64.9%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (68.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 159.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 118.5%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 108.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.0%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.38%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%).