Fijian vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,467,923 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 138.2 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $57,384, a difference of 56.4%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $68,716, a difference of 50.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $117,219, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $55,913, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,857, a difference of 23.1%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 33.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 63.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 170.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 168.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 120.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 53.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%).