Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,851,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 74.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $122,893, a difference of 43.6%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $127,430, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $55,913, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $46,902, a difference of 11.8%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $57,034, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 77.6%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 140.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 74.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 34.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 71.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 71.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 122.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 109.9%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.6%).