Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,432,524 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 89.4 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $57,384, a difference of 30.4%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $68,716, a difference of 30.0%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $127,430, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $55,913, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $46,902, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.2%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 72.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%).