Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,697,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.482% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 481.6 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $57,384, a difference of 17.5%), median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $68,716, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $117,219, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $69,857, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,913, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 23.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 79.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 40.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%).