Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,102,281 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.197% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 197.2 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $68,716, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $46,902, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $57,034, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $69,857, a difference of 0.19%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and per capita income ($55,582 compared to $57,384, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.7%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (62.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).