Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,852,985 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $49,267, a difference of 12.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $95,059, a difference of 10.1%), and median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $55,380, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $61,797, a difference of 1.5%), per capita income ($49,316 compared to $47,284, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 33.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%), bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and associate's degree (50.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 17.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.4%).