Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,554,876 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,278 compared to $47,284, a difference of 11.8%), householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $61,797, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,819 compared to $95,059, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.70%), householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $49,267, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $40,060, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.35%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%).