Chickasaw vs Alsatian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alsatian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Alsatians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alsatian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,292,177 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.484% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 484.1 Alsatians.
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,284, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,435, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,059, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,267, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,797, a difference of 15.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $47,284 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $103,010 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,053 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Good $47,023 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,380 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,060 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $49,267 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $95,059 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,435 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,797 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 24.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.4% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Poor 45.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Alsatian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Alsatian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |