Latvian vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,221,160 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.989. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.522% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 522.2 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $103,010, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $100,435, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,380, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,267, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,797, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,060, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 22.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%).