Blackfeet vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,388,496 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $47,284, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $95,059, a difference of 16.6%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $103,010, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $49,267, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $40,060, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (25.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (63.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.6%).