French Canadian vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,501,538 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $47,284, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $49,267, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $55,380, a difference of 1.2%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $103,010, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $100,435, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 22.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.07 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 67.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.70%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.5%).