Immigrants from South Africa vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,335,477 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.5%), median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $55,380, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($116,286 compared to $103,010, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $49,267, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $40,060, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $61,797, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.2%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%).