Immigrants from Guatemala vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,980,405 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $47,284, a difference of 25.9%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $55,380, a difference of 19.8%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $103,010, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $49,267, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,060, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.0%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (24.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.2%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 79.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.50%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).