Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,847,683 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 27.3 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $61,440, a difference of 4.3%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $88,976, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,252 compared to $106,286, a difference of 0.030%), median earnings ($47,671 compared to $48,032, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $105,309, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.1%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.4%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.62%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.12%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%), bachelor's degree (36.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and college, 1 year or more (58.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.26%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and 5th grade (96.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.3%).