Norwegian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,282,771 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,177, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $88,976, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,144 compared to $106,286, a difference of 0.13%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $44,362, a difference of 0.27%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $61,440, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 36.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.1%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.4%), college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).