Lithuanian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 370,260,562 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 121.1 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $44,362, a difference of 11.5%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $106,286, a difference of 8.6%), and median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $56,663, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $54,436, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $40,177, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.1%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.55%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.7%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%).