Immigrants from Moldova vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,893,807 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $44,362, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $40,177, a difference of 5.3%), and median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $56,663, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $99,429, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $105,309, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $61,440, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%).