Immigrants from Oceania vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,028,886 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 55.2 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,440, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $44,362, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,100 compared to $88,976, a difference of 0.14%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,286, a difference of 0.16%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,177, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.46%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 10.6%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.9%).