Pima vs Portuguese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Portuguese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Portuguese
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Portuguese Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,171,099 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.181% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 180.9 Portuguese.
Pima vs Portuguese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,362, a difference of 44.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,309, a difference of 43.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,976, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,436, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,177, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,429, a difference of 20.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Good $44,362 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Excellent $106,286 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $88,976 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $48,032 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Excellent $56,663 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Good $40,177 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,436 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $99,429 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $105,309 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $61,440 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Pima vs Portuguese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 147.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 119.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 47.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 17.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Excellent 20.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 12.2% |
Pima vs Portuguese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 132.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Pima vs Portuguese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 12.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 40.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Fair 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 82.2% |
Pima vs Portuguese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 68.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 52.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 33.8% |
Pima vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pima vs Portuguese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 52.9%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 50.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Poor 93.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 44.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 35.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Poor 13.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Pima vs Portuguese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 64.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.92%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Portuguese |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 23.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |