Immigrants from Central America vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,342,152 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $44,362, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $106,286, a difference of 25.0%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $56,663, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,436, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $61,440, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.4%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.3%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (68.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%).