Immigrants from Western Europe vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,275,439 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Immigrant from Western Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Europe corresponds to an increase of 197.7 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,065 compared to $44,362, a difference of 12.9%), median male earnings ($60,334 compared to $56,663, a difference of 6.5%), and median family income ($112,688 compared to $106,286, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,957 compared to $54,436, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,654 compared to $99,429, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (47.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 40.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.0%), and master's degree (17.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%).