Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,259,789 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $86,913, a difference of 17.3%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $47,973, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($108,234 compared to $92,545, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $54,599, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $58,226, a difference of 10.3%), and median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $36,673, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (67.7% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.9%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).