Scottish vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 353,906,463 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 40.6 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.9%), median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $47,973, a difference of 16.3%), and per capita income ($44,440 compared to $38,394, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $36,673, a difference of 4.7%), median household income ($85,101 compared to $81,213, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $58,226, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 174.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.4%).