Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,631,594 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $54,599, a difference of 10.6%), and median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $47,973, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $36,673, a difference of 0.96%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $93,176, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $58,226, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.5%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (64.8% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 115.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.6%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.0%).