Alaska Native vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,633,903 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 205.6 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $58,226, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $36,673, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $93,176, a difference of 0.87%), householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $54,599, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $86,913, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.4%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.90%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 67.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.0%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.7%), female unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (65.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 163.0%), high school diploma (89.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.41%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and associate's degree (37.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 170.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.30%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%).