Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from El Salvador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from El Salvador

Poor
Fair
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from El Salvador Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,797,071 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 33.4 Immigrants from El Salvador.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $81,213, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $93,176, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,394, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,673, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $86,913, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,599, a difference of 6.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Tragic
$38,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Tragic
$92,545
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Tragic
$81,213
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Tragic
$42,413
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Tragic
$47,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Tragic
$36,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,599
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Tragic
$86,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Tragic
$93,176
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Tragic
$58,226
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 68.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 68.5%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Excellent
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
13.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 104.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
6.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Tragic
81.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 41.3%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.75 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
44.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Tragic
43.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
36.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Average
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 83.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (81.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and ged/equivalency (76.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
93.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
90.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
90.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
89.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
86.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
85.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
80.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
77.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Tragic
56.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
38.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from El Salvador
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.5%