Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,211,592 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $38,394, a difference of 40.3%), median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $47,973, a difference of 37.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $86,913, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,599, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $58,226, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 49.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 49.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 101.0%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 87.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.4%).