Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 345,345,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 33.2 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 25.0%), median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $47,973, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $54,599, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($80,972 compared to $81,213, a difference of 0.30%), median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $36,673, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $58,226, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 49.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.89%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 53.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 167.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.1%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.2%).