French Canadian vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,005,663 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 11.2 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.6%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $40,434, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $51,594, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $52,450, a difference of 0.42%), median household income ($82,810 compared to $83,304, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $57,580, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 133.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.6%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%).