Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,651,956 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $40,434, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $51,594, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($122,764 compared to $97,222, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $52,450, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $38,833, a difference of 16.7%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 54.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 36.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.1%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 25.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.16%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.9%).