Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,878,213 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 13.3 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $91,533, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $38,833, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $51,594, a difference of 0.47%), median family income ($96,544 compared to $97,222, a difference of 0.70%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $45,090, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 62.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.9%), male disability (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%).