Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,278,939 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.161% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to an increase of 160.6 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $57,580, a difference of 13.0%), median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $38,833, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $52,450, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,435 compared to $91,533, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $51,594, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,427 compared to $96,537, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and single father poverty (17.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.080%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%).