Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,874,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $40,434, a difference of 28.7%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $51,594, a difference of 22.7%), and median family income ($116,942 compared to $97,222, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $52,450, a difference of 6.6%), householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $57,580, a difference of 12.0%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 65.7%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%).