Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,766,046 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,879 compared to $83,304, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $40,434, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $91,533, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $52,450, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $57,580, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 54.3%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 55.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 23.6%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.090%), 12th grade, no diploma (87.7% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 11th grade (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 65.1%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.2%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.17%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.1%).