Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,426,747 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $40,434, a difference of 26.0%), median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $51,594, a difference of 20.3%), and median family income ($115,523 compared to $97,222, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $52,450, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $38,833, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $57,580, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 34.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.33, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.0%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 83.8%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 54.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%).