Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,281,939 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,847 compared to $83,304, a difference of 11.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $96,537, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $91,533, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.6%), per capita income ($37,699 compared to $40,434, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $52,450, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.3%), single father poverty (21.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and single male poverty (17.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 18.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.0%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.9%), bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and college, under 1 year (59.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.010%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%).