Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Spanish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 386,811,773 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Spanish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $53,576, a difference of 28.7%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $83,343, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $92,200, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $50,813, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $60,795, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 37.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.5%), and receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 38.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.10%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.1%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.9%).