Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Spanish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,837,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Spanish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $60,795, a difference of 32.9%), wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,836 compared to $98,554, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $50,813, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($36,857 compared to $38,098, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($41,554 compared to $45,432, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 85.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 71.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (20.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.3%), single male poverty (14.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 47.8%), married-couple households (37.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and currently married (38.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 296.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 142.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 122.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 34.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 81.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 122.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 81.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%).