Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Spanish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,157,328 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Spanish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $92,200, a difference of 28.0%), per capita income ($53,806 compared to $42,249, a difference of 27.4%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $83,343, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.29%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $50,813, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $60,795, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 36.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.070%), and family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 71.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.3%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.1%).