Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Spanish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,355,454 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Spanish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $83,343, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $50,813, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,539 compared to $42,249, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $53,576, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $45,432, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.2%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.17%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.5% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.070%), college, under 1 year (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.8%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%).