Latvian vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,066,690 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.442% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 442.2 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,046, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $84,613, a difference of 37.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,265, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $46,462, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $54,212, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 30.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.7%).