Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Potawatomi

Good
Fair
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,298,902 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 237.6 Potawatomi.
Taiwanese Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $81,774, a difference of 24.1%), median household income ($89,900 compared to $72,576, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $84,613, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $46,462, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $48,768, a difference of 13.9%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.7%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 45.0%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.5%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Poor
12.5%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
80.0%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 25.1%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
36.2%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.3%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.6%

Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 49.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Taiwanese vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricTaiwanesePotawatomi
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%