Immigrants from North America vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,351,725 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.886. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to an increase of 210.7 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $38,046, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,198 compared to $84,613, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($112,151 compared to $88,265, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $46,462, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $34,739, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 31.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.2%).