New Zealander vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Potawatomi

Excellent
Fair
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,819,788 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.805% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,805.3 Potawatomi.
New Zealander Integration in Potawatomi Communities

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $38,046, a difference of 32.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $84,613, a difference of 31.5%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $72,576, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $46,462, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $34,739, a difference of 22.2%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.7%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.2%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
12.5%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.97%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
80.0%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.5%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.35%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.87%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
36.2%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 67.3%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.4%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.6%

New Zealander vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.0%).
New Zealander vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderPotawatomi
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%